Charles Blackwell v. Steven Chisolm, et al
| CHARLES LAMAR BLACKWELL |
| STEVEN CHISOLM, DAVID W. JONES and CITY OF INKSTER, MI |
| 24-1947 |
| October 28, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Charles Blackwell v. Steven Chisholm |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/21/2025;. appellee brief due 02/18/2025; [24-1947, 24-1951] (MRL) [Entered: 12/09/2024 07:39 AM] |
| Filing 10 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - no hearings held in District Court. Filed by Mr. Todd Russell Perkins for Steven Chisolm and City of Inkster, MI in 24-1951. Certificate of Service: 12/06/2024. [24-1951, 24-1947] (TRP) [Entered: 12/06/2024 09:21 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER filed : The plaintiff's motion to consolidate [ # 4 ] [ # 7251061-2 ] is GRANTED The defendants may file a single appellant brief, and the plaintiff may file a single appellee brief. The defendants may file a consolidate reply brief. A separate briefing schedule will issue upon the completion of the electronic transcript order in Case No. 24-1951. (MRL) [Entered: 12/05/2024 03:29 PM]
|
| Filing 8 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Peter E. Doyle for Appellant Mr. David W. Jones. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: Mr. Charles Lamar Blackwell ; Issues: The District Court erred in denying Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss Plaintiff-Appellee's 42 U.S.C. 1983 First Amendment claim on the basis of qualified immunity. Appellant Jones is entitled to qualified immunity because: 1) The First Amended Complaint fails to allege sufficient facts to show that a constitutional violation occurred. 2) Even if the First Amended Complaint alleged sufficient facts to show a constitutional violation, such a constitutional right is not clearly established. . Certificate of Service: 11/12/2024. [24-1947] (PED) [Entered: 11/12/2024 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - no hearings held in District Court. Filed by Mr. Peter E. Doyle for Mr. David W. Jones. Certificate of Service: 11/12/2024. [24-1947] (PED) [Entered: 11/12/2024 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Peter E. Doyle ; Mr. David W. Jones makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 11/12/2024. [24-1947] (PED) [Entered: 11/12/2024 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. David W. Jones by Peter E. Doyle. Certificate of Service: 11/12/2024. [24-1947] (PED) [Entered: 11/12/2024 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellee MOTION filed by Mr. Charles Lamar Blackwell to consolidate for briefing and submission cases 24-1947 & 24-1951. Certificate of Service:10/30/2024. (JEC) [Entered: 10/30/2024 12:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. Peter E. Doyle for Mr. David W. Jones and Mr. Charles Lamar Blackwell, regarding corrected caption. (JEC) [Entered: 10/30/2024 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Michelle R. Lambert (MRL) [Entered: 10/28/2024 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. David Jones. Transcript needed: y. (MRL) [Entered: 10/28/2024 03:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
