Charles Blackwell v. Steven Chisolm, et al
| CHARLES LAMAR BLACKWELL |
| STEVEN CHISOLM and CITY OF INKSTER, MI |
| 24-1951 |
| October 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Charles Blackwell v. Steven Chisholm |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/21/2025;. appellee brief due 02/18/2025; [24-1947, 24-1951] (MRL) [Entered: 12/09/2024 07:39 AM] |
| Filing 12 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - no hearings held in District Court. Filed by Mr. Todd Russell Perkins for Steven Chisolm and City of Inkster, MI in 24-1951. Certificate of Service: 12/06/2024. [24-1951, 24-1947] (TRP) [Entered: 12/06/2024 09:21 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER filed : The plaintiff's motion to consolidate [ # 7251057-2 ] [ # 3 ] is GRANTED The defendants may file a single appellant brief, and the plaintiff may file a single appellee brief. The defendants may file a consolidate reply brief. A separate briefing schedule will issue upon the completion of the electronic transcript order in Case No. 24-1951. (MRL) [Entered: 12/05/2024 03:29 PM]
|
| Filing 10 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Todd Russell Perkins for Appellants Steven Chisolm and City of Inkster, MI. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: City of Inkster, MI and Steven Chisolm ; Issues: Duty to warn employee; Scope of protected speech under the Open Meetings Act; Whether a government employee using his personal social media account acts under the color of law; and If a Monell claim can proceed when there is no practice or custom in place, merely speculation. If a Monell claim can proceed when there is no practice or custom in place, merely speculation . Certificate of Service: 12/03/2024. [24-1951] (TRP) [Entered: 12/03/2024 05:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Todd Russell Perkins ; City of Inkster, MI makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 12/03/2024. [24-1951] (TRP) [Entered: 12/03/2024 05:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Steven Chisolm and City of Inkster, MI by Todd Russell Perkins. Certificate of Service: 12/03/2024. [24-1951] (TRP) [Entered: 12/03/2024 05:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE: The initial transcript order has not been completed. If not completed by 12/06/2024 further action will be taken. (MRL) [Entered: 12/03/2024 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion to dismiss - jurisdiction, [ # 5 ]; previously filed by Mr. Charles Lamar Blackwell. Response from Attorney Mr. Todd Russell Perkins for Appellants Steven Chisolm and City of Inkster, MI. Certificate of Service: 11/18/2024. [24-1951] (TRP) [Entered: 11/18/2024 09:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellee MOTION filed by Mr. Charles Lamar Blackwell to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. Certificate of Service:11/08/2024. (MRL) [Entered: 11/12/2024 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED FILED INCORRECTLY***Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Todd Russell Perkins for City of Inkster, MI and Steven Chisolm to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. Certificate of service: 11/08/2024.--[Edited 11/12/2024 by MRL] (MRL) [Entered: 11/12/2024 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appellee MOTION filed by Mr. Charles Lamar Blackwell to consolidate for briefing and submission cases 24-1947 & 24-1951. Certificate of Service:10/30/2024. (JEC) [Entered: 10/30/2024 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Michelle R. Lambert (MRL) [Entered: 10/29/2024 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Steven Chisolm and City of Inkster, MI. Transcript needed: y. (MRL) [Entered: 10/29/2024 09:59 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
