Darryl McGore v. United States District Court Judges, et al
| DARRYL MCGORE |
| US COURT OF APPEALS JUSTICES, Cincinnati, OH, U.S. SUPREME COURT JUSTICES, DENISE PAGE HOOD, Federal District Court Judge, MITT ROMNEY, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, CONGRESSMAN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGES and JOHN R. ROBERTS, Chief U.S. Supreme Court Justice |
| 24-2078 |
| December 13, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (MRL) [Entered: 02/05/2025 02:54 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed : McGores request to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 4 ] on appeal is moot, given that there is no pending appeal from the August 5 judgment. The appeal is therefore DISMISSED. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication; Jeffrey S. Sutton, Chief Circuit Judge; Danny J. Boggs, Circuit Judge and Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Circuit Judge. (MRL) [Entered: 02/05/2025 02:52 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (MRL) [Entered: 01/07/2025 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Darryl McGore to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 12/17/2024. (MRL) [Entered: 01/07/2025 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Darryl McGore Certificate of Service: 12/26/2024. (MRL) [Entered: 01/07/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of Appeal packet from district court filed. (MRL) [Entered: 12/13/2024 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Darryl McGore. Transcript needed: n. (MRL) [Entered: 12/13/2024 09:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.