Brown-Forman Corporation v. NLRB
| BROWN-FORMAN CORPORATION, dba Woodford Reserve Distillery and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD |
| 24-2107 |
| December 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Brown-Forman Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: first brief due 03/17/2025, second brief due 04/16/2025, third brief due 05/16/2025. [24-2107, 25-1060] (ASM) [Entered: 02/05/2025 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 14 ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. Volumes include: Vol. 1 - Transcript Tr; Vol. 2 - Exhibits Ex; Vol. 3 - Pleadings Pl. Certificate of Service: 02/05/2025. [24-2107, 25-1060] (REB) [Entered: 02/05/2025 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 DEFECTIVE ENTRY APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Cross-Respondent Brown-Forman Corporation in 25-1060, 24-2107 by Jacob W. Crouse. Certificate of Service: 02/04/2025. [25-1060, 24-2107] **Counsel advised to refile form, un-check case #24-2107** (JWC) [Entered: 02/04/2025 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 12 DEFECTIVE ENTRY APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Cross-Respondent Brown-Forman Corporation in 25-1060, 24-2107 by Oliver B. Rutherford. Certificate of Service: 02/04/2025. [25-1060, 24-2107] **Counsel advised to refile form, un-check case #24-2107**--[Edited 02/04/2025 by ASM] (OBR) [Entered: 02/04/2025 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 11 *DEFECTIVE ENTRY**APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Cross-Petitioner NLRB in 25-1060, 24-2107 by Barbara Sheehy. Certificate of Service: 01/30/2025. [25-1060, 24-2107] **Counsel advised to refile form, uncheck case 24-2107**--[Edited 01/30/2025 by ASM] (BAS) [Entered: 01/30/2025 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file administrative record [ # 9 ]. [24-2107, 25-1060] (ASM) [Entered: 01/30/2025 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 9 MOTION filed by Ms. Ruth E. Burdick for NLRB in 24-2107, 25-1060 to extend time to file administrative record until 02/05/2025. Certificate of Service: 01/28/2025. [24-2107, 25-1060] (REB) [Entered: 01/28/2025 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 8 MOTION to INTERVENE filed by Pamela M. Newport for International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 651. Certificate of Service: 01/17/2025. [24-2107] (PMN) [Entered: 01/17/2025 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent NLRB by Barbara Sheehy. Certificate of Service: 01/13/2025. [24-2107] (BAS) [Entered: 01/13/2025 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent NLRB by Usha Dheenan. Certificate of Service: 01/13/2025. [24-2107] (UD) [Entered: 01/13/2025 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Oliver B. Rutherford ; Brown-Forman Corporation makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? NO Certificate of Service: 12/20/2024. [24-2107] (OBR) [Entered: 01/02/2025 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Brown-Forman Corporation by Jacob W. Crouse. Certificate of Service: 01/02/2025. [24-2107] (JWC) [Entered: 01/02/2025 08:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 12/20/2024 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Brown-Forman Corporation by Oliver B. Rutherford. Certificate of Service: 12/20/2024. [24-2107] (OBR) [Entered: 12/20/2024 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 NLRB Case Docketed, for review. Notice filed by Petitioner Brown-Forman Corporation. Petition Received in 6CA: 12/20/2024. (ASM) [Entered: 12/20/2024 11:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
