Papa Diop v. Merrick Garland
PAPA CHEIKHOU DIOP |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General |
24-3312 |
April 17, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Merrick B. Garland by Nehal H. Kamani. Certificate of Service: 04/18/2024. [24-3312] (NHK) [Entered: 04/18/2024 10:48 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 04/17/2024 12:10 PM] |
Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Notice filed by Petitioner Papa Cheikhou Diop. Originating Case No: A 057 170 023. Petition Received in 6CA: 04/11/2024. (CAM) [Entered: 04/17/2024 12:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Papa Diop v. Merrick Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: PAPA CHEIKHOU DIOP | |
Represented By: | Stephanie Mary Blumenau |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Nehal H. Kamani |
Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.