Erik Ceniceros v. Merrick Garland
ERIK CENICEROS |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General |
24-3345 |
April 25, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Merrick B. Garland by Amber A. Arthur. Certificate of Service: 04/26/2024. [24-3345] (AAA) [Entered: 04/26/2024 11:53 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 04/25/2024 03:42 PM] |
Filing 1 Agency Case Docketed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Erik Ceniceros. Originating Case No: A 095 457 952. Petition Received in 6CA: 04/25/2024. (ASM) [Entered: 04/25/2024 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Erik Ceniceros v. Merrick Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: ERIK CENICEROS | |
Represented By: | Terence G. Hoerman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Amber Ashley Arthur |
Represented By: | Office of Immigration Litigation |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.