Ralphiell Braunskill v. Danielle Smith, et al
| RALPHIELL BRAUNSKILL |
| UNION TOWNSHIP, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT, CLERMONT COUNTY, OH PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, CLERMONT COUNTY, OH SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JANE DOE, MATTHEW FARRIS, CLERMONT COUNTY, OH, JOHN DOE, BRYAN TAYLOR and AGENT DANIELLE SMITH |
| 24-3916 |
| October 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (VLP) [Entered: 12/12/2024 06:43 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed: The appeal is DISMISSED. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication. Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Joan L. Larsen, Circuit Judge. (VLP) [Entered: 12/12/2024 06:40 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (VLP) [Entered: 12/06/2024 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Ralphiell Braunskill to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 11/11/2024. (VLP) [Entered: 12/06/2024 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Danielle Smith and Bryan Taylor by Katherine L. Barbiere. Certificate of Service: 11/06/2024. [24-3916] (KLB) [Entered: 11/06/2024 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of appeal packet from district court. (VLP) [Entered: 10/29/2024 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Virginia Padgett (VLP) [Entered: 10/23/2024 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ralphiell Braunskill. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 10/23/2024 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
