Eric Qualls v. Fred Crow, III, et al
| ERIC A. QUALLS |
| DEAN EVANS, Meigs County Appellate Court Judge, JAMES STANLEY, Meigs County Prosecuting Attorney, WILLIAM M. EACHUS, Former Defense Counsel, FRED W. CROW, III, Meigs County Common Pleas Judge, DAN W. FAVREAU, Meigs County Common Pleas Judge and RICHARD WALTON, Meigs County Common Pleas Judge |
| 24-4004 |
| November 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Prisoner trust account statement filed. (VLP) [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 7 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Eric A. Qualls Certificate of Service: 12/10/2024. (VLP) [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Eric A. Qualls to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 12/10/2024. (VLP) [Entered: 12/16/2024 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Eric A. Qualls to grant a certificate of appealability. Certificate of service: 11/14/2024. (VLP) [Entered: 12/02/2024 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (VLP) [Entered: 11/25/2024 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed 11/25/2024 RE#16 denying in forma pauperis. (VLP) [Entered: 11/25/2024 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Virginia Padgett (VLP) [Entered: 11/19/2024 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Eric A. Qualls. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 11/19/2024 02:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
