USA v. Omari Sweat
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
OMARI JACQUES SWEAT |
24-5009 |
January 3, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Rawl Douglas Kazee for Omari Jacques Sweat as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (CAM) [Entered: 01/03/2024 04:05 PM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: C. Anthony Milton (CAM) [Entered: 01/03/2024 04:05 PM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Omari Jacques Sweat. Transcript needed: y. (CAM) [Entered: 01/03/2024 04:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Omari Sweat | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Cynthia T. Rieker |
Represented By: | Haley Trogdlen McCauley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: OMARI JACQUES SWEAT | |
Represented By: | Rawl Douglas Kazee |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.