Nathan Ling v. Campbell County, TN, et al
| NATHAN LING |
| CAMPBELL COUNTY, TN, et al. and DAKOTA WILLIAMS, in his official and individual capacities |
| 24-5051 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Diversity - Civil Rights Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Dakota Williams by Arthur F. Knight, III. Certificate of Service: 01/22/2024. [24-5051] (AFK) [Entered: 01/22/2024 04:29 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed granting stipulation to dismiss case - mediation [ # 6 ] filed by Mr. Arthur F. Knight, III. Entered by order of the court. (CAW) [Entered: 01/22/2024 04:13 PM]
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION filed to dismiss pursuant to FRAP 42 and local rule 33. Stipulation filed by Attorney Mr. Arthur F. Knight, III for Appellant Dakota Williams. Certificate of Service: 01/22/2024. [24-5051] (AFK) [Entered: 01/22/2024 04:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 Letter sent by Mediation Office notifying that a stipulation to dismiss is due 02/16/2024. [Failure to file correctly as instructed in our letter will cause your document to be locked and you will be asked to refile.]. (LMR) [Entered: 01/17/2024 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 4 REGARDING MEDIATION: SCOTT COBURN is the Mediator for this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 01/17/2024 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Mediation Office is involved in this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 01/17/2024 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 01/16/2024 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Dakota Williams. Transcript needed: n. (RLB) [Entered: 01/16/2024 01:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
