James Gandy, Jr. v. David LeMaster, et al
| JAMES ERNEST GANDY, JR. |
| DAVID LEMASTER, RANDA MOORMAN and TERRI BOYD |
| 24-5055 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Deficiency notice filed 02/12/2024. Gandy's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice; 2) the clerk shall send Gandy a 6CCA Form 4 and EDKY Form 523; 3) Gandy must pay the $605.00 appellate fee to the clerk of this court or: (a) complete the 6CCA Form 4, have prison staff complete and sign the EDKY Form 523 and (c) file both with this Court; 4) the Court of Appeals may dismiss the appeal for failure to prosecute if Gandy does not take these steps w/i 28 days; 5) Gandy's Motion to Recuse is DENIED; 6) the Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the clerk of the 6CCA. (SSS) [Entered: 02/13/2024 10:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees David LeMaster, Randa Moorman and Terri Boyd by Cheryl D. Morgan. Certificate of Service: 01/24/2024. [24-5055] (CDM) [Entered: 01/24/2024 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees David LeMaster, Randa Moorman and Terri Boyd by Charles P. Wisdom Jr. Certificate of Service: 01/24/2024. [24-5055] (CPW) [Entered: 01/24/2024 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. James Ernest Gandy, Jr.. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
