Ricky WebbIn re: Ricky Webb
| In re: RICKY LEE WEBB |
| BRANDON WATWOOD, Warden |
| 24-5100 |
| February 1, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER filed to dismiss as a duplicate appeal of case number 24-5093. 6th Cir. R. 45(a)(8). No mandate to issue. (REO) [Entered: 02/01/2024 02:18 PM]
|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (REO) [Entered: 02/01/2024 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Ricky Lee Webb. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 01/30/2024. (REO) [Entered: 02/01/2024 12:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ricky WebbIn re: Ricky Webb | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: RICKY LEE WEBB | |
| Represented By: | Connor Aitken Webber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: BRANDON WATWOOD, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John H. Bledsoe |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
