USA v. Floyd Adams
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: FLOYD T. ADAMS
Case Number: 24-5160
Filed: February 26, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2024 Filing 3 RULING [non-document] to extend appointment of Mr. David S. Hoskins for Floyd T. Adams as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (LTK) [Entered: 02/26/2024 09:50 AM]
February 26, 2024 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Leon Korotko. (LTK) [Entered: 02/26/2024 09:50 AM]
February 26, 2024 Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Floyd T. Adams. Transcript needed: y. (LTK) [Entered: 02/26/2024 09:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Floyd Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Haley Trogdlen McCauley
Represented By: W. Pearce Nesbitt
Represented By: Gregory Thomas Rosenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FLOYD T. ADAMS
Represented By: David S. Hoskins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?