USA v. Gregory Farley
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
GREGORY LEE FARLEY |
24-5245 |
March 19, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 RULING to extend appointment of Mr. Cullen Michael Wojcik for Mr. Gregory Lee Farley as counsel under the Criminal Justice Act. (MRL) [Entered: 03/19/2024 07:49 AM] |
Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Michelle R. Lambert (MRL) [Entered: 03/19/2024 07:48 AM] |
Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Gregory Lee Farley. Transcript needed: y. (MRL) [Entered: 03/19/2024 07:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Gregory Farley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Brent Nelson Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GREGORY LEE FARLEY | |
Represented By: | Gregory Lee Farley |
Represented By: | Cullen Michael Wojcik |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.