Randall Ball v. Adam Douglas
| RANDALL R. BALL |
| ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden |
| 25-1249 |
| March 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER filed to dismiss as a duplicate appeal of case number 25-1181. 6th Cir. R. 45(a)(8). No mandate to issue. (RO) [Entered: 03/27/2025 09:48 AM]
|
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Ryan Orme (RO) [Entered: 03/19/2025 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Randall R. Ball. Transcript needed: n. (RO) [Entered: 03/19/2025 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Randall Ball v. Adam Douglas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: RANDALL R. BALL | |
| Represented By: | Randall R. Ball |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | John S. Pallas |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
