In re: Michael Ford
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FORD
Respondent: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 25-1391
Filed: April 22, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2025 Filing 12 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (RLB) [Entered: 10/08/2025 02:04 PM]
October 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed : We therefore DENY Fords motion for authorization to file a second or successive 2254 petition [ # 1 ] and his motion to compel compliance and the production of records [ # 8 ]. No mandate to issue. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Stephanie Dawkins Davis, Circuit Judge. (RLB) [Entered: 10/08/2025 02:01 PM]
September 2, 2025 Filing 10 NOTIFICATION filed by Michael Christopher Ford regarding submitting true delivery dates pertaining to Alabama and Michigan AR-46 violiations. Dated: 08/27/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 09/03/2025 01:38 PM]
August 15, 2025 Filing 9 CORRESPONDENCE: letter wtih "green" receipt for the motion filed 8/12/25 by Michael Christopher Ford. (RLB) [Entered: 08/15/2025 03:24 PM]
August 12, 2025 Filing 8 Movant MOTION filed by Michael Christopher Ford to compel Alabama Department of Corrections to comply with the AR-416, produce inmate records, and recognize concurrent sentencing . Dated: 08/04/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 08/12/2025 03:19 PM]
July 18, 2025 Filing 7 NOTIFICATION filed by Michael Christopher Ford advising the court of mental illness. Dated: 07/15/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 07/21/2025 11:54 AM]
May 8, 2025 Filing 6 RULING LETTER SENT respondent's motion extend time [ # 3 ] to file a responsive letter for two days that a response will not be filed to the second successive motion is GRANTED and the letter is accepted as filed. (RLB) [Entered: 05/08/2025 02:52 PM]
May 8, 2025 Filing 5 LETTER filed by Ms. Andrea M. Christensen-Brown for MDOC not filing a response to a second successive motion. Certificate of Service: 05/08/2025. [25-1391] (AMC) [Entered: 05/08/2025 02:07 PM]
May 8, 2025 Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent MDOC by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown. Certificate of Service: 05/08/2025. [25-1391] (AMC) [Entered: 05/08/2025 02:06 PM]
May 8, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION filed by Ms. Andrea M. Christensen-Brown for MDOC to extend timeCertificate of Service: 05/08/2025. [25-1391] (AMC) [Entered: 05/08/2025 02:05 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Robin L. Baker (RLB) [Entered: 04/22/2025 02:53 PM]
April 22, 2025 Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Michael Christopher Ford. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 04/18/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 04/22/2025 02:51 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Michael Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FORD
Represented By: Michael Christopher Ford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Andrea M. Christensen-Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?