State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Edward Galka
| STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| EDWARD CHRISTOPHER GALKA |
| 25-1454 |
| May 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Contract: Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 LETTER SENT to Mr. Edward Christopher Galka, returning unfiled reponse to State Farm's motion to dismiss. (ASM) [Entered: 08/27/2025 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 11 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (SSS) [Entered: 08/08/2025 11:40 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER filed: Because Galkas notice of appeal is late, we GRANT State Farms motion to dismiss [ # 6 ] and DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. [ # 6 ] filed by Mr. Cary R. Berlin., decision not for publication. No mandate to issue. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Chief Circuit Judge; Alice M. Batchelder and John B. Nalbandian, Circuit Judges. (SSS) [Entered: 08/08/2025 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Copy of District Court Order filed denying in forma pauperis. (JEC) [Entered: 07/15/2025 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 8 REPLY filed by Mr. Cary R. Berlin for State Farm Life Insurance Company regarding Brief in Support of its Motion to Dismiss the Defendant-Appellant's Notice of Appeal Certificate of Service: 06/19/2025. [25-1454] (CRB) [Entered: 06/19/2025 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed regarding a motion to dismiss case (other), [ # 6 ]; previously filed by Mr. Cary R. Berlin in 25-1454. Response from Party Mr. Edward Christopher Galka Certificate of Service:06/09/2025. (JEC) [Entered: 06/16/2025 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 MOTION filed by Mr. Cary R. Berlin for State Farm Life Insurance Company to dismiss the Defendant-Appellant's Notice of Appeal for failure to timely file Certificate of Service: 05/27/2025. [25-1454] (CRB) [Entered: 05/27/2025 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Cary R. Berlin ; State Farm Life Insurance Company makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 05/27/2025. [25-1454] (CRB) [Entered: 05/27/2025 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee State Farm Life Insurance Company by Cary R. Berlin. Certificate of Service: 05/27/2025. [25-1454] (CRB) [Entered: 05/27/2025 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 The case manager for this case is now: Jill E. Colyer. (ACB) [Entered: 05/27/2025 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 05/12/2025 07:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Edward Christopher Galka. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 05/12/2025 07:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Edward Galka | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Cary R. Berlin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EDWARD CHRISTOPHER GALKA | |
| Represented By: | Edward Christopher Galka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
