Terrell Ross v. Kent County, MI, et al
| TERRELL ROSS |
| KENT COUNTY, MI, KENT COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, MI and COREY PIERCE, Deputy, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity |
| 25-1584 |
| June 27, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (RLB) [Entered: 08/29/2025 08:49 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed : We therefore DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction (late NOA). No mandate to issue, decision not for publication. Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge; David W. McKeague, Circuit Judge and Amul R. Thapar, Circuit Judge. (RLB) [Entered: 08/29/2025 08:43 AM]
|
| Filing 5 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Herman Daniel Hofman for Mr. Corey Pierce regarding Certificate of Service on Plaintiff-Appellant of Appearance of Counsel Herman D. Hofman for Defendants-Appellees Kent County, MI; Kent County Correctional Facility; and Corey Pierce. Certificate of Service: 07/09/2025. [25-1584] (HDH) [Entered: 07/09/2025 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Kent County Correctional Facility, Kent County, MI and Mr. Corey Pierce by Herman D. Hofman. Certificate of Service: 07/09/2025. [25-1584] (HDH) [Entered: 07/09/2025 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 LETTER SENT to Mr. Terrell Ross, directing that the enclosed notice of appeal be signed and returned to this court by 07/18/2025. (MRL) [Entered: 06/27/2025 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Terrell Ross. Transcript needed: n. (MRL) [Entered: 06/27/2025 07:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
