Lutrica Thompkins v. Eugene Zamler, et al
| LUTRICA THOMPKINS, Special/Limited Organized Crime Victim |
| EUGENE BOY ZAMLER, 22688, JUDGE AMY P. HATHAWAY, 40786, ROBERT E. EDICK, 25432, JUDGE MILLER-MARTIN and JUDGE EDWARD J. JOSEPH |
| 25-1702 |
| August 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SEALED DOCUMENT filed by Party Ms. Lutrica Thompkins. Document: State of Michigan, Wayne County documents attached. Sealed due to sensitive information - UCC Financing Statement. (RLB) [Entered: 12/05/2025 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 7 RECORD RECEIVED from Ms. Lutrica Thompkins. Aty/Pty - CD/DVD, Comment: CD with audio filed by Appellant., Sealed: None. (MDD) [Entered: 09/23/2025 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Ms. Lutrica Thompkins Certificate of Service: 08/30/2025. (ALF) [Entered: 09/22/2025 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Ms. Lutrica Thompkins to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 08/30/2025. (ALF) [Entered: 09/22/2025 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee or file a motion for in forma pauperis status by 9/22/2025. (ALF) [Entered: 08/21/2025 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed denying in forma pauperis. (ALF) [Entered: 08/21/2025 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed granting motion to withdraw notice of appeal. (ALF) [Entered: 08/21/2025 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Lutrica Thompkins. Transcript needed: n. (ALF) [Entered: 08/07/2025 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
