Derek Antol v. Robert English, et al
| DEREK ANTOL |
| ROBERT S. ENGLISH, RYAN DANGL, VICTORIA BORDNER, ELIZABETH BOURGEOIS, JACOB LEWIS, MARK KASSUBA, MICHAEL MCDONALD, SCOTT JOSEPHS, LYNARD OLIVER, KEVIN KLOMPARENS, SCOTT GODAIR, BRADLEY STIMAC, JONATHAN MEYER, KAYLIE BIRGY, NICHOLAS RESZKA, SHELLY IZZARD, ED BRINKMAN, Trooper 1 and JACOB CHOICE, Trooper 2 |
| 25-2054 |
| November 19, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 MOTION filed by Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Derek Antol to take judicial notice. Certificate of Service: 05/15/2026. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 05/15/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 21 Argument acknowledgment filed by Attorney Mr. Tyler R. Kitzmiller for Appellees Kaylie Birgy, Victoria Bordner, Elizabeth Bourgeois, Ed Brinkman, Jacob Choice, Ryan Dangl, Robert S. English, Scott Godair, Shelly Izzard, Scott Josephs, Mark Kassuba, Kevin Klomparens, Jacob Lewis, Michael McDonald, Jonathan Meyer, Lynard Oliver, Nicholas Reszka and Bradley Stimac. Certificate of Service: 04/01/2026. [25-2054] (TRK) [Entered: 04/01/2026 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 20 Argument acknowledgment filed by Attorney Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Appellant Derek Antol. Certificate of Service: 03/28/2026. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 03/28/2026 08:12 AM] |
| Filing 19 Errata to Appellant's Reply Brief filed 03/26/2026 by Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Derek Antol. Certificate of Service: 03/28/2026. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 03/28/2026 08:04 AM] |
| Filing 18 REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Appellant Derek Antol. Certificate of Service: 03/26/2026. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 03/26/2026 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 17 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED for 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) on Thursday, June 4, 2026. (RLJ) [Entered: 03/25/2026 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 16 RULING LETTER SENT appellant's motion to extend time to file the reply brief [ # 15 ] for 14 days is GRANTED. Resetting reply brief deadline: reply brief due 03/26/2026. Further extensions of time are unlikely to be granted. (RLB) [Entered: 03/12/2026 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION filed by Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Derek Antol to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 03/11/2026. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 03/11/2026 08:24 PM] |
| Filing 14 APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Mr. Tyler R. Kitzmiller for Kaylie Birgy, Victoria Bordner, Elizabeth Bourgeois, Ed Brinkman, Jacob Choice, Ryan Dangl, Robert S. English, Scott Godair, Shelly Izzard, Scott Josephs, Mark Kassuba, Kevin Klomparens, Jacob Lewis, Michael McDonald, Jonathan Meyer, Lynard Oliver, Nicholas Reszka and Bradley Stimac. Certificate of Service: 02/19/2026. Argument Request: not requested. [25-2054] (TRK) [Entered: 02/19/2026 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 Mediation Office is no longer involved in this appeal. (MLB) [Entered: 02/12/2026 09:31 AM] |
| Filing 12 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Derek Antol. Certificate of Service: 01/20/2026. Argument Request: requested. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 01/20/2026 10:06 PM] |
| Filing 11 VIDEO CONFERENCE: The Mediation conference has been converted to a pre-session conference scheduled for 12/16/2025 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Kathryn Wollenburg, Appellant Counsel and Client. Counsel for the Appellees may participate of their own volition. [Please open notice for important details.] (LMR) [Entered: 12/15/2025 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 10 REGARDING MEDIATION: KATHRYN WOLLENBURG will now be the Mediator for this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 12/15/2025 11:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/20/2026;. appellee brief due 02/19/2026; (RLB) [Entered: 12/10/2025 08:38 AM] |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Tyler R. Kitzmiller ; Kaylie Birgy, Victoria Bordner, Elizabeth Bourgeois, Ed Brinkman, Jacob Choice, Ryan Dangl, Robert S. English, Scott Godair, Shelly Izzard, Scott Josephs, Mark Kassuba, Kevin Klomparens, Jacob Lewis, Michael McDonald, Jonathan Meyer, Lynard Oliver, Nicholas Reszka and Bradley Stimac makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? NO Certificate of Service: 11/25/2025. [25-2054] (TRK) [Entered: 11/25/2025 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Kaylie Birgy, Victoria Bordner, Elizabeth Bourgeois, Ed Brinkman, Jacob Choice, Ryan Dangl, Robert S. English, Scott Godair, Shelly Izzard, Scott Josephs, Mark Kassuba, Kevin Klomparens, Jacob Lewis, Michael McDonald, Jonathan Meyer, Lynard Oliver, Nicholas Reszka and Bradley Stimac by Ryan J. Wier. Certificate of Service: 11/24/2025. [25-2054] (RW) [Entered: 11/24/2025 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Kaylie Birgy, Victoria Bordner, Elizabeth Bourgeois, Ed Brinkman, Jacob Choice, Ryan Dangl, Robert S. English, Scott Godair, Shelly Izzard, Scott Josephs, Mark Kassuba, Kevin Klomparens, Jacob Lewis, Michael McDonald, Jonathan Meyer, Lynard Oliver, Nicholas Reszka and Bradley Stimac by Tyler R. Kitzmiller. Certificate of Service: 11/24/2025. [25-2054] (TRK) [Entered: 11/24/2025 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: J. Nicholas Bostic ; Derek Antol makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No. Certificate of Service: 11/23/2025. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 11/23/2025 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. J. Nicholas Bostic for Appellant Derek Antol. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Kaylie Birgy, Victoria Bordner, Elizabeth Bourgeois, Ed Brinkman, Jacob Choice, Ryan Dangl, Robert S. English, Scott Godair, Shelly Izzard, Scott Josephs, Mark Kassuba, Kevin Klomparens, Jacob Lewis, Michael McDonald, Jonathan Meyer, Lynard Oliver, Nicholas Reszka and Bradley Stimac ; Issues: 1. The Michigan State Police conducted a search of Plaintiff's business and dwelling pursuant to two search warrants on April 11, 2022. The first issues in the appeal will be whether the search warrant was invalid on its face due to material omissions, false statements, stale information, and misleading inferences as it relates to the dwelling. The legal claim is a Fourth Amendment violation and qualified immunity as to the defendants will be part of the analysis. 2. Defendant Josephs escorted Plaintiff around the dwelling property initially and disregarded multiple requests from Plaintiff to use the restroom. Defendant Josephs refused to allow Plaintiff to use a restroom in the dwelling and Plaintiff ultimately had to urinate in his front yard within view of his neighbors dwelling. The legal claim is a violation of the Fourth and/or Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process and whether Defendant Josephs is entitled to qualified immunity. . Certificate of Service: 11/23/2025. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 11/23/2025 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Derek Antol by J. Nicholas Bostic. Certificate of Service: 11/23/2025. [25-2054] (JNB) [Entered: 11/23/2025 09:25 AM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 12/16/2025 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Scott Coburn. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (CAW) [Entered: 11/20/2025 11:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Derek Antol. Transcript needed: n. (RLB) [Entered: 11/19/2025 01:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.