In re: James Sudberry
| In re: JAMES DARNELL ROME SUDBERRY |
| WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION |
| 25-3297 |
| April 18, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (ASM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 08:57 AM] |
Filing 13
ORDER filed: We DENY Sudberrys motion for authorization to file a second or successive 2254 petition. Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge; R. Guy Cole, Jr., Circuit Judge and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge. (ASM) [Entered: 10/10/2025 08:52 AM]
|
| Filing 12 CORRESPONDENCE: supplemental sympathy by Mr. James Darnell Rome Sudberry. (ASM) [Entered: 09/23/2025 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 11 CORRESPONDENCE: work and school history by Mr. James Darnell Rome Sudberry. (ASM) [Entered: 09/22/2025 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 10 LETTER SENT to Mr. James Darnell Rome Sudberry, regarding corresponsdence filed 8/20/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 08/21/2025 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 CORRESPONDENCE: Why have you not sent the file docket or correspondence or the turn-over from the lower court or habeas corpus by Mr. James Darnell Rome Sudberry. (ASM) [Entered: 08/20/2025 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 REPLY filed by Mr. James Darnell Rome Sudberry regarding letter to corrrected second successive motion . Certificate of Service: 06/26/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 07/01/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 LETTER filed by Ms. Jerri L. Fosnaught for Warden, Madison Correctional Institution not filing a response to a second successive motion. Certificate of Service: 05/29/2025. [25-3297] (JLF) [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Warden, Madison Correctional Institution by Jerri L. Fosnaught. Certificate of Service: 05/29/2025. [25-3297] (JLF) [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 5 Corrected second successive motion filed by Mr. James Darnell Rome Sudberry. If the respondent chooses to file a response, it is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 05/06/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 05/15/2025 06:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. James Sudberry to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (ASM) [Entered: 04/18/2025 07:59 AM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to Sixth Circuit. (ASM) [Entered: 04/18/2025 07:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 04/18/2025 07:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 Transferred Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. James D. Sudberry. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 04/17/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 04/18/2025 07:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: James Sudberry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JAMES DARNELL ROME SUDBERRY | |
| Represented By: | James Darnell Rome Sudberry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION | |
| Represented By: | Jerri L. Fosnaught |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
