In re: OptumRX, Inc., et al
| In re: OPTUMRX, INC. and EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. |
| PLAINTIFFS' EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
| NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION |
| 25-3429 |
| June 9, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (SSS) [Entered: 09/05/2025 01:37 PM] |
Filing 18
ORDER filed: Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED [ # 1 ], and the motion to expedite is DENIED AS MOOT [ # 4 ]. Jeffrey S. Sutton, Chief Circuit Judge; Danny J. Boggs and Alan E. Norris, Circuit Judges. (SSS) [Entered: 09/05/2025 01:36 PM]
|
| Filing 17 ADDITIONAL CITATION filed by Mr. Peter H. Weinberger for Plaintiffs' Executive Committee. Certificate of Service: 09/04/2025. [25-3429] (PHW) [Entered: 09/04/2025 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 16 REPLY filed by Mr. Brian D. Boone for OptumRx, Inc. regarding Petition for Writ of Mandamus Certificate of Service: 08/19/2025. [25-3429] (BDB) [Entered: 08/19/2025 11:10 PM] |
| Filing 15 MOTION filed by Mr. Brian D. Boone for OptumRx, Inc. for Leave to File Reply in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandamus Certificate of Service: 08/19/2025. [25-3429] (BDB) [Entered: 08/19/2025 11:05 PM] |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion mandamus case, [ # 1 ]; previously filed by Express Scripts, Inc. and OptumRx, Inc.. Response from Attorney Mr. Peter H. Weinberger for Respondent Plaintiffs' Executive Committee. Certificate of Service: 08/15/2025. [25-3429] (PHW) [Entered: 08/15/2025 03:51 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER filed that Plaintiff's Executive Committee is ORDERED to respond to the petition within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order. Response due 08/15/2025.. (JEC) [Entered: 08/01/2025 03:59 PM]
|
| Filing 11 RECORD RECEIVED from Northern District of Ohio. Flash Drive, Comment: Flash drive containing Exhibits from the 3/12/2025 hearing, as reflected by the transcripts at DE #6037-6038, Sealed: None. (ABH) [Entered: 07/08/2025 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Express Scripts, Inc. by Michael J. Lyle. Certificate of Service: 06/13/2025. [25-3429] (MJL) [Entered: 06/13/2025 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Express Scripts, Inc. by Christopher Michel. Certificate of Service: 06/13/2025. [25-3429] (CGM) [Entered: 06/13/2025 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner Express Scripts, Inc. by Jonathan G. Cooper. Certificate of Service: 06/13/2025. [25-3429] (JGC) [Entered: 06/13/2025 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner OptumRx, Inc. by D. Andrew Hatchett. Certificate of Service: 06/11/2025. [25-3429] (DAH) [Entered: 06/11/2025 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Respondent Plaintiffs' Executive Committee by Peter H. Weinberger. Certificate of Service: 06/09/2025. [25-3429] (PHW) [Entered: 06/09/2025 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner OptumRx, Inc. by Brian D. Boone. Certificate of Service: 06/07/2025. [25-3429] (BDB) [Entered: 06/09/2025 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION filed by Mr. Brian D. Boone for OptumRx, Inc. to expedite decision. Certificate of Service: 06/06/2025. [25-3429] (BDB) [Entered: 06/09/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Petitioner OptumRx, Inc. by Matthew P. Hooker. Certificate of Service: 06/09/2025. [25-3429] (MPH) [Entered: 06/09/2025 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioners Express Scripts, Inc. and OptumRx, Inc.. Petition Received in 6CA: 06/06/2025. (JEC) [Entered: 06/09/2025 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
