Michael Washington v. City of Cincinnati, OH, et al
| MICHAEL WASHINGTON |
| CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH and SHERYL LONG, individually and in her official capacity as City Manager of the City of Cincinnati |
| 25-3692 |
| September 2, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 30 Argument acknowledgment filed by Attorney Mr. Stephen E. Imm for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington. Certificate of Service: 02/13/2026. [25-3692] (SEI) [Entered: 02/13/2026 08:40 AM] |
| Filing 29 Argument acknowledgment filed by Attorney Mr. Matthew T. Crawford for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Certificate of Service: 02/11/2026. [25-3692] (MTC) [Entered: 02/11/2026 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 28 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED for 1:00 P.M. (Eastern Time) on Thursday, March 19, 2026. (ALF) [Entered: 01/30/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 27 REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. Matthew T. Crawford for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Certificate of Service: 01/14/2026. [25-3692] (MTC) [Entered: 01/14/2026 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 25 *LOCKED* APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Matthew T. Crawford for City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Certificate of Service: 01/13/2026. Argument Request: requested. [25-3692] **Counsel advised to refile brief selecting "Reply Brief" as the event code**--[Edited 01/14/2026 by ASM] (MTC) [Entered: 01/13/2026 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 24 RULING LETTER SENT Granting in part joint motion to extend time to file reply brief [ # 23 ]. Further extensions of time are unlikely to be granted. Setting reply brief deadline: reply brief due 01/13/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 12/18/2025 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 23 MOTION filed by Mr. Matthew T. Crawford for City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 12/18/2025. [25-3692] (MTC) [Entered: 12/18/2025 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 22 **LOCKED**STIPULATION filed to extend time to file brief. Stipulation filed by Mr. Matthew T. Crawford for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long, Mr. William Christopher Hicks for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long, Mr. Matthew Jacob Slovin for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long and Mr. Stephen E. Imm for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington, Ms. Samantha B. Isaacs for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington and Mr. Matthew S. Okiishi for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington. Certificate of Service: 12/18/2025. [25-3692] **Counsel advised to refile document as "Motion to extend time to file brief"**--[Edited 12/18/2025 by ASM] (MTC) [Entered: 12/18/2025 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 21 CORRECTED APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Mr. Stephen E. Imm for Mr. Michael Washington.. Certificate of Service: 12/11/2025. Argument Request: requested. [25-3692] (SEI) [Entered: 12/11/2025 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 20 BRIEFING LETTER SENT requesting brief corrections from Mr. Stephen E. Imm for Mr. Michael Washington. Corrected brief due: 12/18/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 12/11/2025 07:07 AM] |
| Filing 19 **LOCKED**APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Mr. Stephen E. Imm for Mr. Michael Washington. Certificate of Service: 12/10/2025. Argument Request: requested. [25-3692]--[Edited 12/11/2025 by ASM] (SEI) [Entered: 12/10/2025 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 18 RULING LETTER SENT granting joint stipulation to extend time to file brief [ # 17 ] filed by Mr. Stephen E. Imm., resetting briefing schedule: appellee brief now due 12/10/2025. (SSS) [Entered: 11/24/2025 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 17 JOINT STIPULATION filed to extend time to file brief. Stipulation filed by Attorney Mr. Stephen E. Imm for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington and Matthew T. Crawford for Appellants. Certificate of Service: 11/24/2025. [25-3692]--[Edited 11/24/2025 by SSS] (SEI) [Entered: 11/24/2025 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 16 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Matthew T. Crawford for City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Certificate of Service: 10/27/2025. Argument Request: requested. [25-3692] (MTC) [Entered: 10/27/2025 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 15 Mediation Office is no longer involved in this appeal. (MLB) [Entered: 09/30/2025 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 14 Letter sent by Mediation Office REGARDING MEDIATION: The Mediation Conference scheduled for 10/01/2025 is hereby canceled. (LMR) [Entered: 09/30/2025 07:56 AM] |
| Filing 13 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Stephen E. Imm ; Mr. Michael Washington makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 09/18/2025. [25-3692] (SEI) [Entered: 09/18/2025 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 12 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington by Matthew S. Okiishi. Certificate of Service: 09/17/2025. [25-3692] (MSO) [Entered: 09/17/2025 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 11 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington by Samantha B. Isaacs. Certificate of Service: 09/17/2025. [25-3692] (SBI) [Entered: 09/17/2025 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 10 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Mr. Michael Washington by Stephen E. Imm. Certificate of Service: 09/17/2025. [25-3692] (SEI) [Entered: 09/17/2025 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 10/27/2025, appellee brief due 11/26/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 09/17/2025 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is unnecessary for appeal purposes. Filed by Mr. William Christopher Hicks for City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Certificate of Service: 09/03/2025. [25-3692] (WCH) [Entered: 09/03/2025 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: William C. Hicks, Matthew T. Crawford and Matthew J. Slovin ; City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? NO Certificate of Service: 09/03/2025. [25-3692] (WCH) [Entered: 09/03/2025 12:10 PM] |
| Filing 6 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. William Christopher Hicks for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Mr. Michael Washington ; Issues: The issues involve whether the Court properly denied qualified immunity on Plaintiff's procedural due process claim and whether defendant Long is entitled to statutory immunity under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 2744 on Plaintiff's defamation claim. . Certificate of Service: 09/03/2025. [25-3692] (WCH) [Entered: 09/03/2025 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long by William C. Hicks. Certificate of Service: 09/03/2025. [25-3692] (WCH) [Entered: 09/03/2025 12:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long by Matthew J. Slovin. Certificate of Service: 09/03/2025. [25-3692] (MJS) [Entered: 09/03/2025 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. IN-PERSON CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 10/01/2025 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Scott Coburn. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 09/03/2025 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long by Matthew T. Crawford. Certificate of Service: 09/03/2025. [25-3692] (MTC) [Entered: 09/03/2025 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants City of Cincinnati, OH and Ms. Sheryl Long. Transcript needed: y. (ASM) [Entered: 09/02/2025 07:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.