Douglas Adacia v. Justin Bibb, et al
| DOUGLAS H. ADACIA, aka Adacia Douglas |
| MAYOR JUSTIN BIBB, CHIEF POLICE DOROTHY A. TODD, POLICE OFFICER STEPHEN BEITEL, UNKNOWN POLICE OFFICER, #2, CLEVELAND PUBLIC LIBRARY, CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH, LIBRARY SECURITY GUARD BANKS, #1, LIBRARY SECURITY GUARD COLEMAN, #2 and UNKNOWN COP, #2 |
| 25-3713 |
| September 5, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER filed : Adacia's motion to proceed IFP [ # 4 ] is DENIED. Unless he pays the $605 filing fee to the district court within 30 days of the date of this order, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Andre B. Mathis, Circuit Judge. (GSA) [Entered: 01/28/2026 03:22 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Douglas H. Adacia. Certificate of Service: 10/24/2025. (GSA) [Entered: 10/30/2025 08:23 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Douglas H. Adacia to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 10/24/2025. (GSA) [Entered: 10/30/2025 08:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. Due to address change, the fee is due in the district court or motion for pauper status is due in the Sixth Circuit by 11/17/2025. (GSA) [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 2 TENDERED handwritten motion for pauper status. Received from Party Mr. Douglas H. Adacia. (GSA) [Entered: 10/16/2025 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Douglas Adacia. Transcript needed: n. (GSA) [Entered: 09/05/2025 02:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
