Delshaun Nix v. Franklin County, OH, et al
| DELSHAUN R. NIX |
| FRANKLIN COUNTY, OH, JAMES L. LOWE, DAVID F. ZEYEN, GEORGE GARY TYACK, TAYLOR M. MICK, SHAYLA D. FAVOR, BENJAMIN A. TRACY, MICHAEL K. SWARTZ, RONALD JOSEPH O'BRIEN and MARK C. COLLINS |
| 25-4020 |
| December 23, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (VLP) [Entered: 05/22/2026 12:17 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed: Nix's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ # 5 ] is DENIED. Unless Nix pays the $605 filing fee to the district court within 30 days of the entry of this order, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Alice M. Batchelder, Circuit Judge. (VLP) [Entered: 05/22/2026 12:11 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Delshaun R. Nix Certificate of Service: 02/26/2026. (VLP) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Delshaun R. Nix to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 02/26/2026. (VLP) [Entered: 03/03/2026 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee. (VLP) [Entered: 01/30/2026 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 Copy of District Court Order filed 01/30/2026 RE# 24 denying in forma pauperis. (VLP) [Entered: 01/30/2026 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Update fee status change to pending in the district court. (VLP) [Entered: 01/22/2026 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Delshaun R. Nix. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 12/23/2025 10:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
