Ronald Emrit, et al v. Elon Musk, et al
| RONALD SATISH EMRIT, aka Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 and PRESIDENTIAL COMMITTEE/POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE/SEPARATE SEGREGATED FUND (SSF) NUMBER C00569897, dba United Emrits of America |
| ELON MUSK, VIVEK RAMASWAMY, MIKE JOHNSON, Speaker of the House and DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY |
| 25-5199 |
| March 11, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 LETTER SENT to Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit, returning unfiled pro se appellant's brief. (ALF) [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 7 LETTER SENT to Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit, returning unfiled pro se appellant's brief. (ASM) [Entered: 04/09/2025 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 5 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (ASM) [Entered: 04/02/2025 11:32 AM] |
Filing 4
ORDER filed: We DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, decision not for publication. No mandate to issue Eric L. Clay, Circuit Judge; Amul R. Thapar, Circuit Judge and Stephanie Dawkins Davis, Circuit Judge. (ASM) [Entered: 04/02/2025 11:29 AM]
|
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 04/23/2025. (ASM) [Entered: 03/11/2025 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Antoinette Macon (ASM) [Entered: 03/11/2025 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Mr. Ronald Satish Emrit and Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 03/11/2025 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
