Fabre Ford v. Fayette County, TN, et al
| DR. FABRE FORD |
| FAYETTE COUNTY, TN, SHERIFF BOBBY RILES, MATTHEW SALAMON and RANDY COLLINS |
| 25-5212 |
| March 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER filed granting stipulation to dismiss case - mediation [ # 17 ] filed by Mr. Nathan D. Tilly. Entered by order of the court. (CAW) [Entered: 06/25/2025 02:21 PM]
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION filed to dismiss pursuant to FRAP 42 and local rule 33. Stipulation filed by Attorney Mr. Nathan D. Tilly for Appellants Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon. Certificate of Service: 06/25/2025. [25-5212] (NDT) [Entered: 06/25/2025 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 16 Letter sent by Mediation Office notifying that a brief or stipulation to dismiss is due 06/27/2025. [Failure to file correctly as instructed in our letter will cause your document to be locked and you will be asked to refile.]. (MLB) [Entered: 04/28/2025 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 15 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Matthew Robert Courtner for Appellant Mr. Randy Collins. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: Fabre Ford ; Issues:. Certificate of Service: 04/15/2025. [25-5212] (MRC) [Entered: 04/15/2025 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 14 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Haynes T. Russell for Appellants Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: Fabre Ford ; Issues:. Certificate of Service: 04/15/2025. [25-5212] (HTR) [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:17 PM] |
| Filing 13 **LOCKED AS DEFECTIVE-COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO CORRECTLY INDENTIFY THE PARTIES AGAINST WHOM THIS APPEAL IS BEING TAKEN**CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Matthew Robert Courtner for Appellant Mr. Randy Collins. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: Mr. Randy Collins ; Issues:. Certificate of Service: 04/04/2025. [25-5212]--[Edited 04/15/2025 by SSS] (MRC) [Entered: 04/04/2025 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 12 **LOCKED AS DEFECTIVE-COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO CORRECTLY INDENTIFY THE PARTIES AGAINST WHOM THIS APPEAL IS BEING TAKEN**CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Haynes T. Russell for Appellants Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Parties Against Whom this Appeal is Being Taken: Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon ; Issues:. Certificate of Service: 04/04/2025. [25-5212]--[Edited 04/15/2025 by SSS] (HTR) [Entered: 04/04/2025 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 05/14/2025; appellee brief due 06/13/2025. (SSS) [Entered: 04/04/2025 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Matthew Courtner ; Mr. Randy Collins makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No. Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (MRC) [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. Randy Collins by Matthew Courtner. Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (MRC) [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Haynes T. Russell ; Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? NO Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (HTR) [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon by Haynes T. Russell. Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (HTR) [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Fayette County, TN, Mr. Bobby Riles and Mr. Matthew Salamon by Nathan D. Tilly. Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (NDT) [Entered: 03/26/2025 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Kevin A. Snider ; Fabre Ford makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (KAS) [Entered: 03/26/2025 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Fabre Ford by Kevin A. Snider. Certificate of Service: 03/26/2025. [25-5212] (KAS) [Entered: 03/26/2025 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 04/10/2025 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Catherine Geyer. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 03/14/2025 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Sharday Swain (SSS) [Entered: 03/13/2025 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Randy Collins, Fayette County, TN, Bobby Riles and Matthew Salamon. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 03/13/2025 02:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
