David Tulis v. Brandon Bennett, et al
| DAVID JONATHAN TULIS |
| BRANDON BENNETT, In his personal capacity, AUSTIN GARRETT, In his personal capacity and HAMILTON COUNTY, TN GOVERNMENT |
| 25-5430 |
| May 7, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPLY BRIEF filed by Party Mr. David Jonathan Tulis Certificate of Service:08/29/2025. (JMK) [Entered: 09/09/2025 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 7 APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Ms. Sharon McMullan Milling for Brandon Bennett, Mr. Austin Garrett and Hamilton County, TN Government. Certificate of Service: 08/06/2025. Argument Request: not requested. [25-5430] (SMM) [Entered: 08/06/2025 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 6 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. David Jonathan Tulis Certificate of Service:07/07/2025. Argument Request: requested. (JMK) [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: David Jonathan Tulis ; Mr. David Jonathan Tulis makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 05/28/2025. (JMK) [Entered: 06/03/2025 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 07/07/2025;. appellee brief due 08/06/2025;. (JMK) [Entered: 05/22/2025 10:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 The case manager for this case is: Joshua K. (JMK) [Entered: 05/07/2025 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. David Jonathan Tulis. Transcript needed: n. (JMK) [Entered: 05/07/2025 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.