Agness McCurry v. D. Thomas, Jr., et al
| AGNESS MCCURRY |
| D. KELLY THOMAS, JR., Senior Judge, JOSEPH P. AHILLEN, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ROGER A. PAGE, Justice, DEE DAVID GAY, Judge, G. ANDREW BRIGHAM, Judge, CONNOR MCDONALD, Assistant General Counsel, CYNTHIA WYRICK, Magistrate and THOMAS A. VARLAN, Judge |
| 25-5500 |
| May 29, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 LETTER SENT to Ms. Agness McCurry in 24-5704, 25-5500, [24-5704, 25-5500] Returning unfiled documents (MRL) [Entered: 10/02/2025 12:23 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed to dismiss for want of prosecution - appellant brief not filed by 9/2/2025. No mandate to issue. [24-5704, 25-5500] (RO) [Entered: 09/17/2025 03:04 PM]
|
| Filing 6 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 09/02/2025. [24-5704, 25-5500] (GSA) [Entered: 07/21/2025 08:00 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed : Upon review and consideration, the plaintiffs motion [ # 7364287-2 ][ # 4 ] is GRANTED, and these appeals are consolidated for briefing and submission. The clerk will reset the briefing schedule. [24-5704, 25-5500] (GSA) [Entered: 07/21/2025 07:55 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Ms. Agness McCurry to consolidate for briefing and submission cases 24-5704 and 25-5500. Certificate of service: 06/09/2025. (RO) [Entered: 06/10/2025 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 07/11/2025. (RO) [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Agness McCurry. Transcript needed: n. (RO) [Entered: 05/29/2025 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.