John Buchanan v. USA
| JOHN DAVID BUCHANAN |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 25-5534 |
| June 4, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (RO) [Entered: 07/07/2025 09:19 AM] |
Filing 3
ORDER filed to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction - late NOA. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr., Circuit Judge; Raymond M. Kethledge, Circuit Judge and Helene N. White, Circuit Judge. (RO) [Entered: 07/07/2025 09:04 AM]
|
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. John David Buchanan. Transcript needed: n. (RO) [Entered: 06/04/2025 08:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: John Buchanan v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOHN DAVID BUCHANAN | |
| Represented By: | John David Buchanan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.