In re: Billie Chapman
| In re: BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN |
| 25-5757 |
| August 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED*** NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Billie Joe Chapman regarding Notice with Attachments A through G.--[Edited 10/23/2025 by RLB] (RLB) [Entered: 10/21/2025 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 RULING LETTER SENT to extend time to pay fee or file motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The fee or motion is now due by Novemer 17, 2025. (RLB) [Entered: 10/17/2025 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 EXHIBIT FILED by Mr. Billie Joe Chapman consisting of A#1 through E#6. Certificate of Service: 09/25/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 10/17/2025 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 2 Petitioner MOTION filed by Mr. Billie Joe Chapman to recuse the district court judge. Certificate of Service:09/22/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 09/30/2025 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 1 Writ of Mandamus filed. Notice filed by Petitioner Mr. Billie Joe Chapman. Petition Received in 6CA: 08/25/2025. (RLB) [Entered: 08/26/2025 11:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Billie Chapman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: BILLIE JOE CHAPMAN | |
| Represented By: | Billie Joe Chapman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
