Mark Stinson, Sr. v. Mark Yates and Wall & Associates, Inc., et al
| MARK T. STINSON, SR. |
| MARK YATES, WALL & ASSOCIATES, INC., JOHN THOMAS FOWLKES, JR., Federal Judge, DAMON KEITH GRIFFIN, SR., NATHAN PATRICK BROOKS, ARTHUR E. QUINN, PATRICK E. STEGALL, LARRY C. MILLER, JOEDAE L. JENKINS, RICKY EDWARD WILKINS, ARCHIE SANDERS, III, BETTY WILLIAMS and NATHAN BURTON |
| 25-5818 |
| September 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (VLP) [Entered: 10/27/2025 03:17 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER filed: We DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Stinsons motions for default judgment [ # 2 ] and to remand [ # 3 ] are DENIED as moot. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication. Karen Nelson Moore, Circuit Judge; R. Guy Cole, Jr., Circuit Judge and Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge. (VLP) [Entered: 10/27/2025 03:15 PM]
|
| Filing 4 LETTER SENT to Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr., regarding non-attorney receiving electronic notice. (VLP) [Entered: 09/18/2025 09:01 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. to remand and motion to waive the filing fee. Certificate of service: 09/17/2025. (VLP) [Entered: 09/18/2025 08:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr. for default judgment . Certificate of service: 09/15/2025. (VLP) [Entered: 09/15/2025 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Mark T. Stinson, Sr.. Transcript needed: n. (VLP) [Entered: 09/12/2025 03:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
