Scotty Inman v. Sharp, et al
| SCOTTY INMAN |
| OFFICER SHARP, DANNY DODD, Warden, HILTON HALL, JR., Warden, SERGEANT CROSS, SERGEANT SHARP, CORE CIVIC SOLUTIONS, CHIEF OF SECURITY THOMAS and HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY |
| 25-6043 |
| November 13, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 LETTER SENT to Mr. Scotty Inman, returning unfiled late notice of appeal. (PJE) [Entered: 01/08/2026 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 7 LETTER SENT to Mr. Scotty Inman, returning unfiled motion for appointment of counsel. This case was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on 12/16/2025. (GSA) [Entered: 12/30/2025 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 6 LOCKED ** DEFECTIVE ENTRY **--[Edited 12/30/2025 by GSA] (GSA) [Entered: 12/30/2025 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (RO) [Entered: 12/16/2025 02:30 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER filed to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction - late notice of appeal. No mandate to issue. Richard Allen Griffin, Circuit Judge; Eric E. Murphy, Circuit Judge and Kevin G. Ritz, Circuit Judge. (RO) [Entered: 12/16/2025 02:29 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Scotty Inman. Certificate of Service: 11/21/2025. (RO) [Entered: 12/01/2025 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Scotty Inman to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 11/21/2025. (RO) [Entered: 12/01/2025 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Scotty Inman. Transcript needed: n. (RO) [Entered: 11/13/2025 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
