Jenai Hayes, et al v. Metro Government of Nashville, et al
| JENAI HAYES, et al., DR. JAMES BAILEY, Consolidated Plaintiffs 3:21-cv-00122, DR. DAMON CATHEY, Consolidated Plaintiffs 3:21-cv-00122 and DR. PIPPA MERIWETHER, Consolidated Plaintiffs 3:21-cv-00122 |
| DR. ADRIENNE BATTLE, METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE & DAVIDSON COUNTY, TN, Consolidated Plaintiffs 3:21-cv-00122, ANN BUNTIN STEINER and JESSE F. HARBISON |
| BRIAN CHRISTOPHER WINFREY |
| 25-6091 |
| November 26, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Jenai Hayes v. Metro. Gov't of Nashville & Davidson Cnty. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 SUBMISSION ON BRIEFS date set for Tuesday, June 2, 2026. (ALF) [Entered: 04/16/2026 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 20 REPLY filed by Mr. Charles Kevin Grant for Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner regarding Reply in Support of Appellees' Motion for Attorneys' Fees for Frivolous Appeal Certificate of Service: 03/27/2026. [25-6091] (CKG) [Entered: 03/27/2026 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 19 REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey for Appellant Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey. Certificate of Service: 03/20/2026. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 03/20/2026 05:23 PM] |
| Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT LOCKED. INCORRECT ENTRY. COUNSEL DIRECTED TO REFILE AS A MOTION TO STRIKE BRIEF***MOTION filed by Mr. Charles Kevin Grant for Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner for to strike confidential document Certificate of Service: 02/27/2026. [25-6091] --[Edited 02/27/2026 by JEC] (CKG) [Entered: 02/27/2026 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 17 MOTION filed by Mr. Charles Kevin Grant for Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner for attorney fees. Certificate of Service: 02/27/2026. [25-6091] (CKG) [Entered: 02/27/2026 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 16 APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Mr. Charles Kevin Grant for Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner. Certificate of Service: 02/27/2026. Argument Request: not requested. [25-6091] (CKG) [Entered: 02/27/2026 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 15 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey for Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey. Certificate of Service: 02/06/2026. Argument Request: requested. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 02/06/2026 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 14 2 DAY EXTENSION: APPELLANT brief now due 02/06/2026 [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 02/04/2026 11:47 PM] |
| Filing 13 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 12 ] filed by Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey., resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/04/2026. appellee brief now due 03/05/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 02/02/2026 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 12 MOTION filed by Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey for Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 02/01/2026. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 02/01/2026 06:19 PM] |
| Filing 11 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file brief [ # 10 ] filed by Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey., resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/02/2026. appellee brief now due 03/03/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 01/26/2026 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION filed by Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey for Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 01/24/2026. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 01/24/2026 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 01/26/2026;. appellee brief due 02/24/2026; (JEC) [Entered: 12/16/2025 03:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey for Appellant Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner ; Issues: 1) Appeal of Court's Fee Determination ruling (the holding and the amount in controversy; (2) appeal of the court's quantum meruit determination as a misapplication under applicable law; (3) unfairness and impropriety of the judicial proceeding . Certificate of Service: 12/10/2025. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 12/10/2025 07:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Brian Christopher Winfrey ; Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 12/10/2025. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 12/10/2025 07:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey by Brian Christopher Winfrey. Certificate of Service: 12/10/2025. [25-6091] (BCW) [Entered: 12/10/2025 07:31 PM] |
| Filing 5 LETTER SENT to Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey for Mr. Brian Christopher Winfrey and Mr. Charles Kevin Grant for Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner and Mr. Jesse F. Harbison, regarding corrected caption to reflect the correct parties. (JEC) [Entered: 12/02/2025 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 3 FILED: Notice Regarding Correct Identity of Appellees by Mr. Charles Kevin Grant for Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner. Certificate of Service: 12/02/2025. [25-6091] (CKG) [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Mr. Jesse F. Harbison and Ms. Ann Buntin Steiner by Charles K. Grant. Certificate of Service: 12/02/2025. [25-6091] (CKG) [Entered: 12/02/2025 09:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants James Bailey, Damon Cathey and Pippa Meriwether. Transcript needed: n. (JEC) [Entered: 11/26/2025 11:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
