Trevor Johnson v. Shannon Butrum
Petitioner: TREVOR JOHNSON
Respondent: SHANNON BUTRUM, Warden
Case Number: 25-6104
Filed: December 4, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2025 Filing 3 Copy of 6CA letter sending the COA construed as the notice of appeal to the DC for filing. (PJE) [Entered: 12/08/2025 12:43 PM]
December 4, 2025 Filing 2 Respondent not served. Petition dismissed in district court without service on respondent. (ACB) [Entered: 12/04/2025 08:38 AM]
December 4, 2025 Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied. Notice filed by Appellant Trevor Johnson. Transcript needed: n. (ACB) [Entered: 12/04/2025 08:25 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Trevor Johnson v. Shannon Butrum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TREVOR JOHNSON
Represented By: Trevor Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SHANNON BUTRUM, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?