John Doe #1, et al v. William Lee, et al
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE 4, JOHN DOE 5, JOHN DOE 6, JOHN DOE 7, JOHN DOE 8 and JOHN DOE 9
Defendant: WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Governor of the State of Tennessee, in his official capacity and DAVID B. RAUSCH, Director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity
Case Number: 25-6122
Filed: December 10, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 28, 2026 Filing 19 Argument acknowledgment filed by Attorney Mr. Gabriel Krimm for Appellant David B. Rausch. Certificate of Service: 05/28/2026. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 05/28/2026 10:10 AM]
May 21, 2026 Filing 18 Argument acknowledgment filed by Attorney Mr. Walter Justin Adams for Appellees John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9. Certificate of Service: 05/21/2026. [25-6122] (WJA) [Entered: 05/21/2026 01:06 PM]
May 20, 2026 Filing 17 VIDEO ARGUMENT SCHEDULED for 2:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) on Tuesday, August 4, 2026. (KSF) [Entered: 05/20/2026 03:20 PM]
May 8, 2026 Filing 16 REPLY BRIEF filed by Attorney Mr. Gabriel Krimm for Appellant David B. Rausch. Certificate of Service: 05/08/2026. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 05/08/2026 04:20 PM]
April 23, 2026 Filing 15 LETTER filed by Mr. Walter Justin Adams for John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9 communicating dates of unavailability for oral argument: May 14-15; July 20-August 3; October 9-19; October 9-30, 2026. Certificate of Service: 04/23/2026. [25-6122] (WJA) [Entered: 04/23/2026 11:01 AM]
April 22, 2026 Filing 14 LETTER filed by Mr. Gabriel Krimm for David B. Rausch communicating dates of unavailability for oral argument: 7/30, 7/31. Certificate of Service: 04/22/2026. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 04/22/2026 09:25 AM]
April 10, 2026 Filing 13 APPELLEE BRIEF filed by Mr. Walter Justin Adams for John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9. Certificate of Service: 04/10/2026. Argument Request: requested. [25-6122] (WJA) [Entered: 04/10/2026 11:13 PM]
February 13, 2026 Filing 12 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Gabriel Krimm for David B. Rausch. Certificate of Service: 02/13/2026. Argument Request: requested. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 02/13/2026 05:12 PM]
January 9, 2026 Filing 11 RULING LETTER SENT granting motion to extend time to file briefs [ # 10 ] filed by Mr. Walter Justin Adams., resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 02/13/2026, appellee brief now due 04/10/2026, reply brief now due 05/08/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 01/09/2026 07:21 AM]
January 8, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION filed by Mr. Walter Justin Adams for John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9 to extend time to file brief. Certificate of Service: 01/07/2026. [25-6122] (WJA) [Entered: 01/08/2026 09:38 AM]
January 7, 2026 Filing 9 **LOCKED**MOTION filed by Mr. Walter Justin Adams for John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9 for SET NEW FILING DEADLINES Certificate of Service: 01/07/2026. [25-6122] *Counsel advised to refile motion selecting "Extend time to file brief" as the relief code*--[Edited 01/08/2026 by ASM] (WJA) [Entered: 01/07/2026 03:21 PM]
December 26, 2025 Filing 8 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 02/04/2026, appellee brief due 03/06/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 12/26/2025 07:28 AM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is unnecessary for appeal purposes. Filed by Mr. Gabriel Krimm for David B. Rausch. Certificate of Service: 12/24/2025. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 12/24/2025 12:55 PM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Gabriel Krimm ; David B. Rausch makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 12/24/2025. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 12/24/2025 12:54 PM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 5 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Gabriel Krimm for Appellant David B. Rausch. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? Yes ; Case Name: John Doe #1, et al v. William Lee, et al, No. 23-5248 , Citation: Doe v. Lee, 102 F.4th 330 (6th Cir. 2024) ; Was this case mediated through the court's program: No. ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9 ; Issues: 1. Did the district court err by addressing the merits of the remaining Ex Post Facto clause claims? 2. Did the district court err by holding that Tennessee sex-offender regulations violate the Ex Post Facto clause? 3. Did the district court err by granting improper injunctive relief? . Certificate of Service: 12/24/2025. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 12/24/2025 12:53 PM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant David B. Rausch by Gabriel Krimm. Certificate of Service: 12/24/2025. [25-6122] (GK) [Entered: 12/24/2025 12:42 PM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: W. Justin Adams ; John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9 makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No Not Applicable 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 12/24/2025. [25-6122] (WJA) [Entered: 12/24/2025 12:36 PM]
December 24, 2025 Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, John Doe 7, John Doe 8 and John Doe 9 by W. Justin Adams. Certificate of Service: 12/24/2025. [25-6122] (WJA) [Entered: 12/24/2025 12:34 PM]
December 10, 2025 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant David B. Rausch. Transcript needed: n. (ASM) [Entered: 12/10/2025 10:33 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Doe #1, et al v. William Lee, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE #1
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE #2
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 4
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 5
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 6
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 7
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 8
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 9
Represented By: Walter Justin Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILLIAM BYRON LEE, Governor of the State of Tennessee, in his official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID B. RAUSCH, Director of the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity
Represented By: Gabriel Krimm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?