David Sifuentes, III v. Corewell Health
| DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III |
| COREWELL HEALTH, fka Spectrum Health System |
| 26-1248 |
| March 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER filed regarding en banc petition. The panel adheres to its original decision. The Clerk shall now refer the matters to all of the active members of the court for further proceedings on the suggestion for en banc rehearing. Entered by order of the court. [26-1037, 26-1248] (BLH) [Entered: 08/28/2026 02:44 PM]
|
Filing 13
ORDER filed to reinstate case. (ASM) [Entered: 06/11/2026 09:12 AM]
|
Filing 12
ORDER filed to dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to pay filing fee. No mandate to issue. (ASM) [Entered: 06/11/2026 08:57 AM]
|
| Filing 11 PETITION for en banc rehearing filed by Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III. Certificate of Service: none; dated 05/20/2026. (BLH) [Entered: 05/20/2026 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 10 CORRESPONDENCE: notice of submission by Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III. (ASM) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 9 TENDERED supplemental leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Received from Party Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III. (ASM) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 8 TENDERED amended complaint. Received from Party Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III. (ASM) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appellant MOTION for leave to file amended complaint, to supplement the record with proposed amendment, and suppelmental motion to proceed in form pauperis filed by Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III. Certificate of service: 05/06/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 05/07/2026 03:31 PM] |
Filing 6
ORDER filed: Sifuentess five motions for leave to proceed IFP [ # 7450963-2 ] [ # 7461803-2 ] [ # 7461993-2 ] [ # 7455092-2 ] [ # 4 ] are DENIED. Unless he paysthe $605 filing fee in each case to the district court within 30 days of the entry of this order, each of his five appeals will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Alice M. Batchelder, Circuit Judge. [25-2050, 25-2088, 25-2097, 25-2103, 26-1248] (RLB) [Entered: 05/06/2026 10:53 AM]
|
| Filing 5 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III Certificate of Service: 03/27/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. David Angel Sifuentes, III to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 03/27/2026. (received thru pro se mail box) (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2026 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 4A4 ORDER from district court filed. Order Filed: 03/12/2026. (ASM) [Entered: 03/27/2026 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 4a4 Notice filed. Case held in abeyance pending ruling on the motion for reconsideration filed in the district court 3/05/2026, RE #21. (ASM) [Entered: 03/06/2026 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Sifuentes, III v. Corewell Health | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III | |
| Represented By: | David Angel Sifuentes III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: COREWELL HEALTH, fka Spectrum Health System | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.