USA v. Richard Hughes
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RICHARD LEE HUGHES
Case Number: 26-1279
Filed: March 20, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER filed granting Appellant's motion to dismiss case - voluntarily [ # 10 ] filed by Mr. Senad Ramovic. (JBO) [Entered: 05/11/2026 03:23 PM]
May 11, 2026 Filing 10 MOTION filed by Mr. Senad Ramovic for Richard Lee Hughes to dismiss voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Certificate of Service: 05/11/2026. [26-1279] (SR) [Entered: 05/11/2026 03:12 PM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 05/27/2026;. appellee brief due 06/26/2026; (JBO) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:38 PM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee USA by A. Tare Wigod. Certificate of Service: 04/17/2026. [26-1279] (ATW) [Entered: 04/17/2026 02:30 PM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 7 Transcript, [4], has been filed in the District Court on 04/17/2026 ; Court Reporter: Mr. Robert L. Smith ; Actual Number of Pages: 67 ; Actual Number of Volumes: 2 ; [26-1279] (RLS) [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:22 PM]
April 17, 2026 Filing 6 Court Reporter Acknowledgement filed by Mr. Robert L. Smith, for transcript [4] ; Arrangements for payment were made on 04/10/2026 ; Estimated completion date: 04/17/2026 ; Estimated number of pages: 67 . [26-1279] (RLS) [Entered: 04/17/2026 12:21 PM]
April 13, 2026 Filing 5 NOTIFICATION: Setting acknowledgement deadline, relating to transcript order, [4]. Robert L. Smith's acknowledgement is due 04/27/2026. (JBO) [Entered: 04/13/2026 09:26 AM]
April 13, 2026 Filing 4 TRANSCRIPT ordered from Mr. Robert L. Smith, filed by Mr. Senad Ramovic for Richard Lee Hughes. [4] ; ----- This is to order a transcript of the following proceedings and to certify that satisfactory financial arrangements have been completed ----- Transcript ordered on: 04/10/2026 ; District Court Judge/Magistrate: Matthew F. Leitman ; Hearing Dates: 08/11/2025 - plea hearing and 03/09/2026 sentencing ; Method of Payment: Federal Defender ; Court reporter acknowledgement is due in 14 days. Certificate of Service: 04/13/2026. [26-1279] (SR) [Entered: 04/13/2026 09:18 AM]
April 10, 2026 Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Richard Lee Hughes by Senad Ramovic. Certificate of Service: 04/10/2026. [26-1279] (SR) [Entered: 04/10/2026 09:34 AM]
April 7, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE: The initial transcript order has not been completed. If not completed by 04/10/2026 further action will be taken. (JBO) [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:04 PM]
March 20, 2026 Filing 1 Criminal Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Richard Lee Hughes. Transcript needed: y. (JBO) [Entered: 03/20/2026 02:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Richard Hughes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: A. Tare Wigod
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD LEE HUGHES
Represented By: Senad Ramovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?