Richard Smith, Sr. v. Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, et al
| RICHARD ALLEN SMITH, SR. |
| BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF MICHIGAN, JEROME W. ZIMMER, JR., Chief Clerk of the Michigan Court of Appeals, PATRICIA A. MURRAY, District Clerk of the Michigan Court of Appeals, STEPHEN L. BORRELLO, Chief Judge Pro Tem of the Michigan Court of Appeals, SISTERS OF CHARITY HOSPITAL, PAULA FEROLETO, Justice, STATE OF NEW YORK, JULIA B. OWDZIEJ, Circuit Court Judge, KEVIN P. KALES, Michigan Workers Compensation Magistrate, STEPHEN BROWN, Judge Michigan Unemployment and WASHTENAW COUNTY, MI |
| 26-1379 |
| April 21, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Richard Allen Smith, Sr. Certificate of Service:04/22/2026. Argument Request: not received. (JBO) [Entered: 04/23/2026 07:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 Financial Affidavit filed by Party Mr. Richard Allen Smith, Sr. Certificate of Service: 04/22/2026. (JBO) [Entered: 04/23/2026 07:31 AM] |
| Filing 3 Appellant MOTION filed by Mr. Richard Allen Smith, Sr. to proceed in forma pauperis. Certificate of service: 04/22/2026. (JBO) [Entered: 04/23/2026 07:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 NOTIFICATION filed by Mr. Richard Allen Smith, Sr. regarding Docketing Statement. Certificate of Service: 04/22/2026. (JBO) [Entered: 04/23/2026 07:22 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Richard Allen Smith, Sr.. Transcript needed: n. (JBO) [Entered: 04/21/2026 12:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.