Kelly Reeves v. Bedford Public Schools, et al
| KELLY REEVES |
| BEDFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, SHELLY FARNAN, SHELBY CAMPBELL, SOPHIE RESSLER, MARK FRENCH and CARL SCHULTZ |
| 26-1412 |
| April 30, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mediation Office is no longer involved in this appeal. (MLB) [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 07/27/2026. appellee brief now due 08/24/2026. (MLB) [Entered: 06/08/2026 03:46 PM] |
| Filing 10 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 06/29/2026;. appellee brief due 07/27/2026; (JBO) [Entered: 05/18/2026 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Ms. Kelly Reeves by Nicholas Roumel. Certificate of Service: 05/18/2026. [26-1412] (NBR) [Entered: 05/18/2026 08:52 AM] |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Lindsay P. Hazen ; Bedford Public Schools, Shelby Campbell, Shelly Farnan, Mark French, Sophie Ressler and Carl Schultz makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? NO Certificate of Service: 05/15/2026. [26-1412] (LPH) [Entered: 05/15/2026 05:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Nicholas Roumel ; Ms. Kelly Reeves makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? no 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? no Certificate of Service: 05/14/2026. [26-1412] (NBR) [Entered: 05/14/2026 11:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Nicholas B. Roumel for Appellant Ms. Kelly Reeves. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Bedford Public Schools, Shelby Campbell, Shelly Farnan, Mark French, Sophie Ressler, Carl Schultz and Ms. Kelly Reeves ; Issues: Whether the lower court erred by dismissing (a) Plaintiff's state created danger claim; (b) her supervisory liability and Monell liability claims; (c) her gross negligence claims; and (4) her disability discrimination claims. . Certificate of Service: 05/14/2026. [26-1412] (NBR) [Entered: 05/14/2026 11:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 VIDEO CONFERENCE: The Mediation conference has been rescheduled for 06/08/2026 at 2:00 PM (ET) with Catherine Geyer. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (CAW) [Entered: 05/04/2026 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Bedford Public Schools, Shelby Campbell, Shelly Farnan, Mark French, Sophie Ressler and Carl Schultz by Lindsay P. Hazen. Certificate of Service: 05/01/2026. [26-1412] (LPH) [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Bedford Public Schools, Shelby Campbell, Shelly Farnan, Mark French, Sophie Ressler and Carl Schultz by Kenneth B. Chapie. Certificate of Service: 05/01/2026. [26-1412] (KBC) [Entered: 05/01/2026 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 05/29/2026 at 9:30 AM (ET) with Catherine Geyer. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 05/01/2026 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Kelly Reeves. Transcript needed: y. (JBO) [Entered: 04/30/2026 08:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
