Rahshida Cartwright v. Melow, et al
| RAHSHIDA CARTWRIGHT |
| POLICE OFFICER MELOW, POLICE OFFICER MCDERMED, POLICE OFFICER MOLCHAN, POLICE OFFICER JOHNS, POLICE OFFICER POSLER, CHRISTOPHER KOTT, Police Officer, UNKNOWN FEMALE OFFICERS, CLERK OF THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT, MAGISTRATE BERNIER, JUDGE KAVANNAGH, KAREN VICTORI, Court-Appointed Attorney, JADA [UNKNOWN], Probation Officer, JOHNNY [UNKNOWN], Registered Nurse, Trinity Health Livonia, RACHEL PEREZ, MSP Chemist, CITY OF LIVONIA, MI, JUDGE JAMES J. JOLLY, SYDNEY ROGERS, 16TH DISTRICT COURT and LIVONIA POLICE DEPARTMENT |
| 26-1455 |
| May 14, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. (RO) [Entered: 06/16/2026 03:29 PM] |
Filing 11
ORDER filed to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction. No mandate to issue, decision not for publication, pursuant to FRAP 34(a)(2)(C). Alice M. Batchelder, Circuit Judge; Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judge and Amul R. Thapar, Circuit Judge. (RO) [Entered: 06/16/2026 03:27 PM]
|
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Ryan Wier ; Ms. Rachel Perez makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 06/09/2026. [26-1455] (RW) [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 9 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Ms. Rachel Perez by Ryan Wier. Certificate of Service: 06/09/2026. [26-1455] (RW) [Entered: 06/09/2026 10:01 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER filed denying motion to consolidate for briefing [ # 7532156-2 ] filed by Ms. Rahshida Cartwright in 26-1139. [26-1139, 26-1455] (RO) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 8 SIGNED NOTICE OF APPEAL filed by Ms. Rahshida Cartwright. (RO) [Entered: 05/22/2026 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Trent B. Collier ; Karen Victori makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 05/21/2026. [26-1455] (TBC) [Entered: 05/21/2026 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 5 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Karen Victori by Trent B. Collier. Certificate of Service: 05/21/2026. [26-1455] (TBC) [Entered: 05/21/2026 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Eric S. Goldstein ; City of Livonia, MI, Clerk of the 16th District Court, Johns, Mr. Christopher Kott, McDermed, Melow, Molchan, Posler and Ms. Sydney Rogers makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 05/18/2026. [26-1455] (ESG) [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees 16th District Court, City of Livonia, MI, Clerk of the 16th District Court, Johns, Mr. Christopher Kott, McDermed, Melow, Molchan, Posler and Ms. Sydney Rogers by Eric S. Goldstein. Certificate of Service: 05/18/2026. [26-1455] (ESG) [Entered: 05/18/2026 10:23 AM] |
| Filing 2 LETTER SENT to Ms. Rahshida Cartwright, directing that the enclosed notice of appeal be signed and returned to this court by 05/28/2026. (RO) [Entered: 05/14/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Rahshida Cartwright. Transcript needed: n. (RO) [Entered: 05/14/2026 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.