Dana Nessel v. KalshiEX LLC
Plaintiff: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan and the Michigan Gaming Control Board
Defendant: KALSHIEX LLC, a Delaware corporation based in New York
Case Number: 26-1639
Filed: July 27, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Securities Commodities Exchg.
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2026 Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant KalshiEX LLC. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 07/27/2026 01:43 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dana Nessel v. KalshiEX LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan on behalf of the People of the State of Michigan and the Michigan Gaming Control Board
Represented By: Lauren E. Fitzsimons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KALSHIEX LLC, a Delaware corporation based in New York
Represented By: Neal Kumar Katyal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?