Shawn PickensIn re: Shawn Pickens
| In re: SHAWN FEAON PICKENS |
| ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden |
| 26-1670 |
| August 5, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 RULING LETTER SENT directing Movant Mr. Shawn Feaon Pickens to file a corrected second successive habeas motion. (RO) [Entered: 08/05/2026 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. (RO) [Entered: 08/05/2026 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Shawn Feaon Pickens. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 08/04/2026. (RO) [Entered: 08/05/2026 09:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Shawn PickensIn re: Shawn Pickens | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: SHAWN FEAON PICKENS | |
| Represented By: | Shawn Feaon Pickens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ADAM DOUGLAS, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.