Tanisha Pendleton v. DeAnthony Shaw, et al
| TANISHA NICOLE PENDLETON |
| DEANTHONY D. SHAW, Assistant Attorney General, DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING & REGULATORY AFFAIRS, (LARA) and MICHIGAN BOARD OF NURSING DISCIPLINARY SUBCOMMITTEE, named as TLARA Disciplinary Subcommittee |
| 26-1766 |
| September 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 11/30/2026. appellee brief now due 01/04/2027. (LMR) [Entered: 10/20/2026 08:30 AM] |
| Filing 15 VIDEO CONFERENCE: The Mediation conference has been rescheduled for 11/13/2026 at 9:30 AM (ET) with John A. Minter. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 10/20/2026 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 14 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees LARA, Michigan Board of Nursing Disciplinary Subcommittee and Mr. DeAnthony D. Shaw by Bridget K. Smith. Certificate of Service: 10/14/2026. [26-1766] (BKS) [Entered: 10/14/2026 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 13 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton by Colter Paulson. Certificate of Service: 10/08/2026. [26-1766] (CLP) [Entered: 10/08/2026 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 12 BRIEFING LETTER SENT by Mediation Office, resetting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 11/17/2026. appellee brief now due 12/21/2026. (LMR) [Entered: 10/07/2026 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 11/03/2026 at 9:30 AM (ET) with John A. Minter. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 10/07/2026 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 10 RULING LETTER SENT to appoint Mr. Colter Lawrence Paulson for Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton, pro bono. (CL) [Entered: 10/07/2026 02:37 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER filed : The Court, sua sponte, ORDERS the clerk to appoint pro bono counsel to represent plaintiff, Tanisha Nicole Pendleton, for the limited purpose of mediation with the Office of the Circuit Mediators pursuant to 6 Cir. R. 33(b). (CL) [Entered: 10/07/2026 02:31 PM]
|
| Filing 7 REPLY filed by Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton regarding emergency motion for stay and injunction pending appeal. Certificate of Service: 10/01/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 10/01/2026 07:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in opposition filed regarding a motion, [ # 4 ]; previously filed by Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton. Response from Attorney Ms. Jennifer Matuja for Appellees LARA, Michigan Board of Nursing Disciplinary Subcommittee and Mr. DeAnthony D. Shaw. Certificate of Service: 09/28/2026. [26-1766] (JM) [Entered: 09/28/2026 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 11/06/2026;. appellee brief due 12/09/2026;. (JEC) [Entered: 09/24/2026 08:19 AM] |
| Filing 4 EMERGENCY MOTION filed by Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton to stay injunction pending appeal. Certificate of Service:09/16/2026. (JEC) [Entered: 09/17/2026 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Mr. DeAnthony D. Shaw, LARA and Michigan Board of Nursing Disciplinary Subcommittee by Jennifer Matuja. Certificate of Service: 09/15/2026. [26-1766] (JM) [Entered: 09/15/2026 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 LETTER SENT to Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton and Ms. Alyssa Coast for LARA, Mr. DeAnthony D. Shaw and Michigan Board of Nursing Disciplinary Subcommittee, regarding the amended caption. (JEC) [Entered: 09/04/2026 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Tanisha Nicole Pendleton. Transcript needed: n. (JMK) [Entered: 09/01/2026 08:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
