Stacy Patronik v. Ryan Pieske
| STACY LYNN PATRONIK |
| RYAN PIESKE, in his individual capacity, jointly and severally |
| 26-1798 |
| September 9, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Ms. Josephine A. DeLorenzo for Appellant Mr. Ryan Pieske. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? No ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Ms. Stacy Lynn Patronik ; Issues:. Certificate of Service: 09/11/2026. [26-1798] (JAD) [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 8 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - no hearings held in District Court. Filed by Ms. Josephine A. DeLorenzo for Mr. Ryan Pieske. Certificate of Service: 09/11/2026. [26-1798] (JAD) [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Josephine A. DeLorenzo ; Mr. Ryan Pieske makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No. 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No. Certificate of Service: 09/11/2026. [26-1798] (JAD) [Entered: 09/11/2026 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 6 REGARDING MEDIATION: JOHN MINTER will now be the Mediator for this appeal. (LMR) [Entered: 09/10/2026 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION OFFICE is involved in this appeal. VIDEO CONFERENCE: A Mediation conference has been scheduled for 10/05/2026 at 2:00 PM (ET) with Scott Coburn. [Please open notice for important details and deadlines.] (LMR) [Entered: 09/10/2026 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Wolfgang Mueller ; Ms. Stacy Lynn Patronik makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? NO 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? NO Certificate of Service: 09/10/2026. [26-1798] (WM) [Entered: 09/10/2026 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee Ms. Stacy Lynn Patronik by Wolfgang Mueller. Certificate of Service: 09/10/2026. [26-1798] (WM) [Entered: 09/10/2026 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellant Mr. Ryan Pieske by Josephine A. DeLorenzo. Certificate of Service: 09/10/2026. [26-1798] (JAD) [Entered: 09/10/2026 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Ryan Pieske. Transcript needed: y. (ASM) [Entered: 09/09/2026 03:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stacy Patronik v. Ryan Pieske | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STACY LYNN PATRONIK | |
| Represented By: | Wolfgang Mueller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: RYAN PIESKE, in his individual capacity, jointly and severally | |
| Represented By: | Charles L. Bogren |
| Represented By: | Josephine A. DeLorenzo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
