Harvey PrestonIn re: Harvey Preston
Petitioner: In re: HARVEY LEE PRESTON
Respondent: SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden
Case Number: 26-2002
Filed: November 10, 2026
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2026 Filing 2 Copy of District Court Order filed to transfer proceedings to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. (JBO) [Entered: 11/10/2026 11:14 AM]
November 10, 2026 Filing 1 TENDERED Second Successive Motion Docketed. Notice filed by Movant Mr. Harvey Lee Preston. 2nd/Successive Motion Received in 6CA: 11/10/2026. (JBO) [Entered: 11/10/2026 11:13 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harvey PrestonIn re: Harvey Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden
Represented By: Andrea M. Christensen-Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: In re: HARVEY LEE PRESTON
Represented By: Harvey Lee Preston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?