Christopher Foster v. NEOCC
| CHRISTOPHER FOSTER |
| NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER |
| 26-3010 |
| January 6, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER filed to dismiss for want of prosecution for failure to pay fee. No mandate to issue. (MRL) [Entered: 03/04/2026 08:50 AM]
|
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellee NEOCC by Kevin L. Nguyen. Certificate of Service: 01/07/2026. [26-3010] (KLN) [Entered: 01/07/2026 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Christopher Foster. Transcript needed: n. (MRL) [Entered: 01/06/2026 07:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Christopher Foster v. NEOCC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER FOSTER | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER | |
| Represented By: | Daniel P. Struck |
| Represented By: | Kevin L. Nguyen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
