Jeffrey Clemens v. USA, et al
| JEFFREY L. CLEMENS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BARBARA DISTEL, MARC KUDLEY, DAVID KASULONES, MICHAEL MEISLER, OFFICER MICHAEL SCHERER and DANBURY TOWNSHIP, OH |
| 26-3352 |
| April 22, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RULING LETTER SENT granting appellant's first motion to extend time to file brief for 60 days [ # 5 ] filed by Jeffrey L. Clemens., resetting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief now due 08/05/2026. appellee brief now due 09/08/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 05/15/2026 08:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 Appellant MOTION filed by Jeffrey L. Clemens to extend time to file brief for 60 days. Certificate of service: 05/10/2026. (RGF) [Entered: 05/13/2026 10:15 AM] |
| Filing 4 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Michael Scherer and Danbury Township, OH by Teresa L. Grigsby. Certificate of Service: 04/28/2026. [26-3352] (TLG) [Entered: 04/28/2026 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Barbara Distel, David Kasulones, Marc Kudley and USA by Angelita Cruz Bridges. Certificate of Service: 04/28/2026. [26-3352] (ACB) [Entered: 04/28/2026 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 2 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting pro se briefing schedule: appellant brief due 06/04/2026;. appellee brief due 07/07/2026;. (RGF) [Entered: 04/22/2026 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellant Jeffrey L. Clemens. Transcript needed: n. (RGF) [Entered: 04/22/2026 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
