William Saki, et al v. Charles Norman, et al
| WILLIAM SAKI, JEFFREY WONSER and PATRICK D. CORRIGAN |
| CHARLES L. NORMAN and ANDY WILSON |
| 26-3495 |
| June 1, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 BRIEFING LETTER SENT requesting brief corrections from Mr. Brian D. Bardwell for Mr. Jeffrey Wonser, Mr. William Saki and Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan because statement regarding oral argument is required FRAP 34; 6 Cir. R. 34. Corrected brief due: 08/04/2026. (JMK) [Entered: 07/28/2026 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 10 **LOCKED - STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT IS REQUIRED FRAP 34; 6 CIR. R. 34** APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Brian D. Bardwell for Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan, Mr. William Saki and Mr. Jeffrey Wonser. Certificate of Service: 07/25/2025. Argument Request: requested. [26-3495]--[Edited 07/28/2026 by JMK] (BDB) [Entered: 07/28/2026 12:03 AM] |
| Filing 9 BRIEFING LETTER SENT setting briefing schedule: appellant brief due 07/27/2026;. appellee brief due 08/24/2026; (JMK) [Entered: 06/15/2026 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 8 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Charles L. Norman and Andy Wilson by Andrew Fraser. Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3495] (JAF) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Ryan C. Spitzer ; Charles L. Norman and Andy Wilson makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3495] (RS) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 APPEARANCE filed for Appellees Charles L. Norman and Andy Wilson by Ryan C. Spitzer. Certificate of Service: 06/15/2026. [26-3495] (RS) [Entered: 06/15/2026 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 TRANSCRIPT ORDER filed - transcript is already on file in the District Court Clerks Office. Filed by Mr. Brian D. Bardwell for Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan, Mr. William Saki and Mr. Jeffrey Wonser. Certificate of Service: 06/12/2026. [26-3495] (BDB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Name of Counsel: Brian D. Bardwell ; Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan, Mr. William Saki and Mr. Jeffrey Wonser makes the following disclosure: 1. Is said party a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly owned corporation? No 2. Is there a publicly owned corporation, not a party to the appeal, with a financial interest in the outcome? No Certificate of Service: 06/12/2026. [26-3495] (BDB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 CIVIL APPEAL STATEMENT OF PARTIES AND ISSUES filed by Attorney Mr. Brian D. Bardwell for Appellants Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan, Mr. William Saki and Mr. Jeffrey Wonser. Is this case a cross-appeal? No ; Has this case or a related one been before this court previously? Yes ; Case Name: Wonser v. Norman , Citation: No. 25-3509 ; Was this case mediated through the court's program: Yes ; Please identify the party(ies) the appeal is being taken against: Charles L. Norman and Andy Wilson ; Issues:. Certificate of Service: 06/12/2026. [26-3495] (BDB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 APPEARANCE filed for Appellants Mr. William Saki, Mr. Jeffrey Wonser and Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan by Brian D. Bardwell. Certificate of Service: 06/12/2026. [26-3495] (BDB) [Entered: 06/12/2026 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 Civil Case Docketed. Notice filed by Appellants Mr. Patrick D. Corrigan, Mr. William Saki and Mr. Jeffrey Wonser. Transcript needed: y. (JMK) [Entered: 06/01/2026 10:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
