Robert Hathorn v. Cynthia Davis
| ROBERT T. HATHORN |
| WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS |
| 26-3530 |
| June 12, 2026 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit |
| Prisoner: Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 4a4 Notice filed. Case held in abeyance pending a ruling on the motion for reconsiderations filed in district court at RE #31 & 32. (SSS) [Entered: 06/12/2026 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Case Docketed with certificate of appealability denied in district court 05/21/2026. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Robert T. Hathorn. Transcript needed: n. (SSS) [Entered: 06/12/2026 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Hathorn v. Cynthia Davis | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ROBERT T. HATHORN | |
| Represented By: | Robert T. Hathorn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: WARDEN CYNTHIA DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | William H. Lamb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
